U.S. Directive Allows Killing Endangered Species if Not Primary Purpose of Activity, Critics Say

Harrisburg Lancaster Lebanon York, PA, September 21, 2026 —

A directive issued by the Trump administration through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service states that developers and loggers can kill endangered species incidental to their activities, as long as the primary purpose of those activities is not to harm the animals. This policy change has drawn criticism from those who argue it significantly weakens the protections afforded by the Endangered Species Act.

The directive, issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, clarifies the conditions under which certain take prohibitions for endangered species would apply. Under the Endangered Species Act, the “take” of an endangered species is generally prohibited, with “take” defined to include harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. However, the new guidance indicates that such actions, if they are an unavoidable consequence of otherwise lawful activities, may be permissible if the primary intent is not the killing or harming of the species.

Environmental advocacy groups and other critics contend that this interpretation fundamentally undermines the conservation goals of the Endangered Species Act. They argue that the law’s intent is to prevent harm to endangered species, regardless of the primary purpose of the human activity. The potential for increased incidental killings of protected wildlife is a central concern.

The specifics regarding how “primary purpose” is determined and how incidental takes will be monitored or enforced were not detailed in the provided summary. The contractor’s name or specific entity involved in issuing the directive was not provided. The timeline for the directive’s implementation or any immediate impacts on ongoing development or logging projects were also not specified.

The Endangered Species Act, enacted in 1973, is a landmark piece of environmental legislation designed to protect threatened and endangered species and their habitats. Its provisions are intended to halt and reverse the decline of wildlife populations and to protect ecosystems upon which endangered species depend.

Critics fear this directive could lead to a decline in populations of species already facing extinction and may allow for development to proceed with less consideration for the wildlife that may be impacted. The full implications of this policy shift for conservation efforts remain a subject of ongoing debate and concern among environmental stakeholders.

Story summarized from the original created by Alex Brown on penncapital-star.com, see more information here.

Media gallery